Subject area: Materials Data Management Solution When was the last time you checked how much of the data in your in-house spare parts catalog is incorrect? By incorrect I mean wrong or out of date description, part number, supplier details and so on. Recently I saw a report indicating that
Materials Master Data Maturity in the Era of Industry 4.0
This content has been removed However, you might be interested in this article, Management of Spare Parts: Are You Playing by the Right Rules.
What are the Benefits of NATO Coding?
Q: What are the Benefits of NATO Coding? A: The benefits of using any standard coding system come from the standardization. This enables easier identification of items for procurement, design, exchange, disposal and so on. The specific economic advantages will be unique to your situation. You can read more on
How Should We Classify Spare Parts Suppliers and Vendors
Q: How should we classify spare parts suppliers and vendors A: My suggestion is that you classify suppliers/vendors of spare parts on a combination of spare part criticality and vendor exclusivity. So, if you have a critical spare part from a vendor that is the sole supplier of that part
Which Items Should be Catalogued?
Q: At a high level, what are your thoughts on what ‘should’ be catalogued within an inventory system. Obviously all relevant spare parts that have/require a BoM’s connection are a given, but where do you draw the line on consumable type items. By value? By purchasing frequency? Particularly if these