Spare Parts Know How

Spare Parts Inventory Management Training

  • Log-In
  • Individual
    • Open Access
    • Practitioner Toolkit
    • Compare Options
  • Organization/Team
    • Foundations for Teams
    • Foundations Playbook
    • Operations Playbook
    • Enterprise Access
    • Compare Options
  • Targeted Improvement Programs
    • Capability Programs
    • Advisory Support
    • Inventory Optimization Software
    • Data Management Services
  • Resources
    • The Spare Parts Decision Framework
    • Spare Parts Capability Playbooks
    • Roadmap for Spare Parts Decision Capability
    • Site Capability Assessment
    • Spare Parts Management Checklists
    • Obsolescence Risk Calculator
    • Criticality Assessment Tool
    • ROP/ROQ Calculator
    • Last Time Buy Calculator
    • Books
    • Practitioner Playbook Digital Library
  • Contact
  • About
    • Past and Current Users
    • Testimonials
    • FAQs
    • Phillip Slater

The Flip Side of Accountability

April 11 spkhadmin

Establishing appropriate accountability is one of the key actions required for achieving lasting success in any management activity.

This is especially the case in activities aimed at creating lasting change in the way things are done – like in an inventory optimization project. 

To achieve lasting and sustainable inventory optimization you need to establish the appropriate accountability for those undertaking the review actions and those responsible for implementing the change.

Recently I encountered a situation where some of the team were very keen to avoid any direct accountability. 

No real surprise there as this is often the case.

What did surprise me was the effort they put in to ensure that they could not be held to account for making the necessary changes (if only they had worked so hard on actually undertaking the required tasks!).

One specific avoidance action was to reject attempts to install any system of measurement that showed what progress was being made with their efforts at inventory optimization and executing the requires changes.

But here is the catch.

Now that there is real progress and genuine early success with the inventory reduction those same people now are concerned that they are not getting recognition for their work!

They have undertaken the inventory optimization tasks from our training but now complain that there is a lack of transparency showing how much good work they have done.

That is the flip side of accountability – recognition.

If you do not have the necessary transparency to indicate who has done what, then you don’t have the transparency to show who to reward for their good efforts.

We are now working on changing this at that company but it is a lesson that team has learned the hard way.

 
 

Ready to learn more?Click Here

 
 

 

Implementation

Make Better Spare Parts Decisions

Decide what to stock, how much to hold, and how to tackle excess inventory using practical tools, templates, and specialist guidance.
Explore the Practitioner Toolkit...

Get Your Team Making Consistent Decisions

Align maintenance, procurement, engineering, and stores around shared spare parts decision principles to improve inventory performance. Explore Foundations for Teams...

Turn Improvement Goals into Results

Reduce excess inventory, improve stocking policies, or standardize practices across sites with a targeted program combining team development, practical tools, and implementation support. Explore Capability Programs...

Latest Blog Posts

  • Why Spare Parts Inventory Optimization Doesn’t Stick
  • AI Spare Parts Technology Won’t Fix Weak Decisions
  • Twenty-Five Years of Better Spare Parts Decisions
  • The Cost of Inconsistent Spare Parts Decisions
  • Spare Parts Capability Cannot Reside in One Person
  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 IPIAIGHT PTY LTD.