Spare Parts Know How

Spare Parts Inventory Management Training

  • Log-In
  • Individual
    • Practitioner Toolkit
    • Open Access
    • Compare Options
  • Organization/Team
    • Foundations for Teams
    • Enterprise Access
    • Foundations Playbook
    • Operations Playbook
    • Compare Options
  • Targeted Improvement Programs
    • Capability Programs
    • Advisory Support
    • Inventory Optimization Software
    • Data Management Services
  • Resources
    • The Spare Parts Decision Framework
    • Spare Parts Capability Playbooks
    • Roadmap for Spare Parts Decision Capability
    • Site Capability Assessment
    • Spare Parts Management Checklists
    • Obsolescence Risk Calculator
    • Criticality Assessment Tool
    • ROP/ROQ Calculator
    • Last Time Buy Calculator
    • Books
    • Practitioner Playbook Digital Library
  • Contact
  • About
    • Past and Current Users
    • Testimonials
    • FAQs
    • Phillip Slater

Inventory Myth #2 – Inventory Risk Must be Re-evaluated to Reduce Inventory

June 18 spkhadmin

5 Myths of Inventory ReductionReducing holding quantities in inventory is often seen as requiring a corresponding increase with inventory risk. This might be the risk of extended downtime in manufacturing or the risk of lost sales in wholesale/retail.

However, this is not true.

For this to be true you must believe that the existing holdings are as lean as they can be in the current economic dynamic. While it is possible that this is true, experience shows that this is unlikely.

Consider some of the issues that might result in a need to change inventory holdings:

  1. The initial holding parameters will have been set without any history of usage and therefore might not have been correct. (They were after all a guess!)
  2. Suppliers might have implemented supply chain initiatives. In the past 10 years or so supply chain improvement has been a focus of most distribution activity so the initial assumptions might now be outdated.
  3. You might have experienced continuous improvement in your own systems (at least we hope so!)
  4. There may be new opportunities for consignment stock. Changing market dynamics may have created opportunities not previously available.

These are just some of the issues. In each of these examples, the actual inventory risk will have reduced significantly compared to the initial assumptions.

If the tolerance for risk has not changed, then reviewing these issues will not increase your risk

Addressing these issues requires a fresh consideration of the dynamics of supply and demand but do not necessarily require an increase in risk.

 
 
These myths are explained in the ebook 5 Myths of Inventory Reduction – available as part of the Practitioner Playbook.
 
 


 
Posted by: Phillip Slater
 

Inventory Optimization

Make Better Spare Parts Decisions

Decide what to stock, how much to hold, and how to tackle excess inventory using practical tools, templates, and specialist guidance.
Explore the Practitioner Toolkit...

Get Your Team Making Consistent Decisions

Align maintenance, procurement, engineering, and stores around shared spare parts decision principles to improve inventory performance. Explore Foundations for Teams...

Turn Improvement Goals into Results

Reduce excess inventory, improve stocking policies, or standardize practices across sites with a targeted program combining team development, practical tools, and implementation support. Explore Capability Programs...

Latest Blog Posts

  • Why Spare Parts Inventory Optimization Doesn’t Stick
  • AI Spare Parts Technology Won’t Fix Weak Decisions
  • Twenty-Five Years of Better Spare Parts Decisions
  • The Cost of Inconsistent Spare Parts Decisions
  • Spare Parts Capability Cannot Reside in One Person
  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 IPIAIGHT PTY LTD.